Neuvottelija.com

Episode 81 · 2021-05-25 · 34:52 · Original in Finnish

Personality Profiling Does Not Work | Sinnu Savola | Negotiator 81

Originally published as “Persoonallisuusprofilointi ei toimi | Sinnu Savola | Neuvottelija 81”

Psychologist Sinnu Savola states plainly that DISC and Myers-Briggs are not used in professional psychology, and explains why: their scientific basis is weak, they force respondents into artificial either/or choices between items that are not opposites, and they push very different people into the same category. Personality traits, she says, always lie on a continuum, and around 80 per cent of people carry so much of both introversion and extroversion that what emerges depends on the context. Big Five is statistically far sounder, but even there she warns that a test only works if the sample it was built on represents the population it is used on. The episode's most useful turn is her insistence that psychometric properties — IQ included — are convenient statistically but poor guides at the level of one individual, and that organisations would get more from the environmental and leadership factors that are known to bring out someone's potential. Miettinen counters with his own recruitment method: a valuation exercise, control questions and a deliberate pressure test, which he demonstrates on Savola live. She turns it around, and the closing exchange is about how feedback is given and taken.

Guest: Sinnu Savola · Host: Sami Miettinen

Watch and listen

Watch on YouTube JSON Markdown

Key moments

  1. 00:00 — The megalomaniac problems of DISC and Myers-Briggs
  2. 00:43 — Guest: psychologist Sinnu Savola
  3. 01:08 — Occupational health psychology and an early-stage startup
  4. 01:31 — The Jungian four-field as a starting point
  5. 02:16 — Jung himself considered his model crude
  6. 02:59 — An individualistic and Western way of seeing personality
  7. 03:18 — Individuation, anima and animus as more interesting
  8. 03:48 — The DISC model and Surrounded by Idiots
  9. 04:38 — Psychologists use neither DISC nor Myers-Briggs
  10. 05:39 — Forced choices separate people artificially
  11. 06:04 — Reading versus washing rugs as an example
  12. 06:42 — The model forces different people into the same category
  13. 07:06 — Traits always lie on a continuum
  14. 07:24 — Why type models feel intuitively right
  15. 08:06 — Myers-Briggs does not even measure Jungian traits
  16. 08:44 — Big Five and the five factors
  17. 09:16 — Conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness and agreeableness
  18. 09:29 — The scales are valid and reliable
  19. 10:04 — People still experience themselves as introverts or extroverts
  20. 10:34 — Workplace Big Five and the NEO-PI-3
  21. 10:59 — The representativeness of the sample decides whether a test works
  22. 11:46 — Personality is strongly context-dependent
  23. 12:16 — Does personality change with age
  24. 12:53 — Crises can change personality quickly
  25. 13:09 — Environmental factors determine the best potential
  26. 14:04 — Psychometrics do not predict performance at work
  27. 15:04 — Who wants a neurotic bookkeeper
  28. 15:53 — Routines kill you, or lead to success
  29. 16:14 — Chain analysis as a tool of behaviour change
  30. 16:56 — Emotional arousal and the amygdala hijack
  31. 18:05 — Freud and repression in a critical light
  32. 18:52 — Can a psychological test be gamed
  33. 19:48 — Control questions and the consistency of answers
  34. 21:29 — The army's block test and psychological profiling
  35. 22:18 — Hard IQ versus flimsier personality
  36. 23:09 — General intelligence and its components
  37. 23:50 — IQ works statistically but not at the individual level
  38. 24:35 — What an IQ requirement in recruitment is really after
  39. 25:57 — Competence is a great deal more than that
  40. 26:00 — A valuation exercise as a recruitment tool
  41. 26:31 — Control questions and the reaction to pressure
  42. 27:00 — Ten divided by four per cent
  43. 28:00 — The reaction reveals more than the answer
  44. 29:30 — Recruiting without outside help
  45. 30:15 — A methodical and fair process
  46. 31:00 — Contextualising psychological testing
  47. 31:44 — Interim analysts as a continuous recruitment channel
  48. 32:35 — Categories attract because uncertainty is uncomfortable
  49. 33:00 — Regulating emotions in recruitment
  50. 33:20 — How feedback is given and received
  51. 34:33 — Closing words and thanks

Summary

Psychologist Sinnu Savola states plainly that DISC and Myers-Briggs are not used in professional psychology, and explains why: their scientific basis is weak, they force respondents into artificial either/or choices between items that are not opposites, and they push very different people into the same category. Personality traits, she says, always lie on a continuum, and around 80 per cent of people carry so much of both introversion and extroversion that what emerges depends on the context. Big Five is statistically far sounder, but even there she warns that a test only works if the sample it was built on represents the population it is used on. The episode’s most useful turn is her insistence that psychometric properties — IQ included — are convenient statistically but poor guides at the level of one individual, and that organisations would get more from the environmental and leadership factors that are known to bring out someone’s potential. Miettinen counters with his own recruitment method: a valuation exercise, control questions and a deliberate pressure test, which he demonstrates on Savola live. She turns it around, and the closing exchange is about how feedback is given and taken.

Chapters

Watch

The recording lives on the Neuvottelija channel: Persoonallisuusprofilointi ei toimi | Sinnu Savola | Neuvottelija 81. A Finnish edition of this episode is published at www.neuvottelija.fi.

People and topics

Guests: Sinnu Savola

Topics: Leadership & Governance Negotiation

AI and agent resources


Source and content status

Provenance: Finnish source: Owner page created on 2026-08-30 from a MacWhisper Finnish transcription (346 cues, entity pass applied from the archived raw). Chapter timecodes are the publisher's own YouTube chapter list, verified cue by cue against the transcript, and the titles are translated from it. Subtitles are Finnish only; no English cue track shipped.. English subtitles: publisher-provided English cues, imported and quality-checked. QA coverage 100% (transcript timecoded). Original episode: neuvottelija.fi. Imported 2026-08-30 · last reviewed 2026-08-30. Passages the source audio left genuinely ambiguous are marked [unclear] rather than guessed.