Neuvottelija.com

Episode 22 · 2020-06-07 · 53:33 · Original in Finnish

Antiquity and Negotiating Power | Juhana Torkki | Neuvottelija 22

Originally published as “Antiikki ja Neuvotteluvalta | Juhana Torkki | neuvottelija 22”

Author and translator Juhana Torkki and his co-author Sami Miettinen trace, in Turku, the arc from a doctoral thesis on the rhetoric of the apostle Paul through the books Puhevalta and Uusi neuvotteluvalta to Finnish translations of Seneca and Plutarch. The episode explains why an ancient letter required the whole thought to be finished before writing began and how slowness deepens thinking. The discussion contrasts Plutarch's practical techniques for governing the mind with Stoic determinism and the doctrine of the perfect sage, and asks what the patron-client relationship and etymological discoveries reveal about our own time. It closes on Quintilian's claim that a good speaker must first be a good person, and why workplace communication is needlessly abstract.

Guest: Juhana Torkki · Host: Sami Miettinen

Watch and listen

Watch on YouTube JSON Markdown

Key moments

  1. 00:00 — Turku Plutarch and staying in your home town
  2. 02:30 — The labour of writing on papyrus and ancient audiobooks
  3. 05:00 — Why slow formats deepen a thought
  4. 07:30 — The thesis on Paul at the Areopagus and the arc of themes
  5. 10:00 — Bill Clinton Cicero's structure and a speech in the Finnish parliament
  6. 12:30 — Michelle Obama Greta Thunberg and new rhetorical examples
  7. 15:00 — The four levers and the negotiator's inner world
  8. 17:30 — Seneca and Plutarch as texts on the philosophy of living
  9. 20:00 — The professional hides emotion; patron and client
  10. 22:30 — Etymology apatheia and concursus as cleansers of terms
  11. 25:00 — Plutarch as positive psychology and Stoic determinism
  12. 27:30 — The doctrine of the perfect sage and Plutarch's gentler path
  13. 30:00 — Slaves in ancient texts and the wrestling analogy of equal resistance
  14. 32:30 — Ahtisaari on judging an oppressor people and layered meaning
  15. 35:00 — The black and white of online argument versus dialectic
  16. 37:30 — Speaking negotiating and leading as three core skills
  17. 40:00 — Quintilian and the education of an orator from infancy
  18. 42:30 — Vir bonus the good speaker must first be a good person
  19. 45:00 — The absence of ethos and hiding behind a pseudonym
  20. 47:30 — Ancient dialogue versus abstract workplace communication
  21. 50:00 — The arc of Uusi neuvotteluvalta as a growth story
  22. 52:30 — Translating Quintilian and the limits of translation

Summary

Author and translator Juhana Torkki and his co-author Sami Miettinen trace, in Turku, the arc from a doctoral thesis on the rhetoric of the apostle Paul through the books Puhevalta and Uusi neuvotteluvalta to Finnish translations of Seneca and Plutarch. The episode explains why an ancient letter required the whole thought to be finished before writing began and how slowness deepens thinking. The discussion contrasts Plutarch’s practical techniques for governing the mind with Stoic determinism and the doctrine of the perfect sage, and asks what the patron-client relationship and etymological discoveries reveal about our own time. It closes on Quintilian’s claim that a good speaker must first be a good person, and why workplace communication is needlessly abstract.

Chapters

Watch

The recording lives on the Neuvottelija channel: Antiikki ja Neuvotteluvalta | Juhana Torkki | neuvottelija 22. A Finnish edition of this episode is published at www.neuvottelija.fi.

People and topics

Guests: Juhana Torkki

Topics: Negotiation

AI and agent resources


Source and content status

Provenance: Finnish source: Owner page assembled from YouTube metadata, the neuvottelija.fi episode record and the published Neuvottelija AI edition summary. No transcript imported.. English subtitles: publisher-provided English cues, imported and quality-checked. QA coverage 0% (metadata only). Original episode: neuvottelija.fi. Imported 2026-08-13 · last reviewed 2026-08-13. Passages the source audio left genuinely ambiguous are marked [unclear] rather than guessed.