Neuvottelija.com

Episode 123 · 2022-02-27 · 48:34 · Original in Finnish

IPOs, Mergers and Board Work | Petri Niemi | Negotiator 123

Originally published as “Hallitustyö IPO & fuusio | Petri Niemi | Neuvottelija 123”

Petri Niemi has run seven listings and chaired the boards of most of those companies. He opens up why Siili Solutions was the case that opened Finland's First North, how Bilot dared to list in March 2020 into the teeth of the Covid crash, and what an anchor investor's thumbs-up actually buys. The conversation moves on to the Bilot–Vincit merger, still awaiting shareholder approval at the time of recording, and to why listing is worth it at all: owners in different cycles, a liquid share as acquisition currency, easier banking. It closes on the most common trap in software consultancies — products built by consultants on the bench — the one rule of board work, and the company he is proudest of.

Guest: Petri Niemi · Host: Sami Miettinen

Core theses

  1. The anchor investor's value is the signal, not the money: the offering is decided by who has already said yes.
  2. A listed share is acquisition currency, which is the argument for listing that survives when the fundraising argument does not.
  3. Products built by consultants between assignments almost never become products, and it is the most repeated mistake in the sector.
  4. The one rule of board work: the chair runs the board and the chief executive runs the company, and most board dysfunction is that line being crossed.

Watch and listen

Watch on YouTube JSON Markdown

Key moments

  1. 00:00 — Petri Niemi: from CapMan to free radical
  2. 02:22 — Siili Solutions opened the First North market
  3. 04:29 — A small offering and five acquisitions paid in shares
  4. 05:12 — Detection Technology and the Chinese factory
  5. 07:05 — Vincit, the listing, and the share as a way of committing people
  6. 08:28 — Bilot's IPO in the middle of the Covid crash
  7. 10:34 — The anchor investors saved the offering
  8. 12:53 — First North must not turn into crowdfunding
  9. 14:24 — What Bilot actually does around SAP
  10. 15:34 — Motley, and service design as the cherry on top
  11. 17:01 — The Bilot–Vincit merger by share exchange
  12. 19:12 — A share exchange against a cash offer
  13. 20:16 — Synergies: an agile house meets large corporates
  14. 23:06 — Next Games and IP-based games
  15. 24:08 — Lounea, Finland's fastest builder of fibre
  16. 27:07 — Reselling Visma, and business services
  17. 28:09 — Loihde's technical listing, and why it limps
  18. 29:35 — When it would be worth Lounea listing
  19. 31:27 — Seven IPOs: when listing is the right path
  20. 33:30 — LeadDesk, an orthodox SaaS company
  21. 34:44 — Clausion and the move off the licence model, with its SaaS trough
  22. 36:34 — The myth of a consultancy's little products
  23. 38:54 — How a board is built before a listing
  24. 42:44 — The chair runs the board, the chief executive runs the company
  25. 46:19 — ICEYE, the satellite company Niemi is proudest of

Summary

Petri Niemi has run seven listings and chaired the boards of most of those companies. He opens up why Siili Solutions was the case that opened Finland’s First North, how Bilot dared to list in March 2020 into the teeth of the Covid crash, and what an anchor investor’s thumbs-up actually buys. The conversation moves on to the Bilot–Vincit merger, still awaiting shareholder approval at the time of recording, and to why listing is worth it at all: owners in different cycles, a liquid share as acquisition currency, easier banking. It closes on the most common trap in software consultancies — products built by consultants on the bench — the one rule of board work, and the company he is proudest of.

What an anchor actually buys

Not the capital. The anchor investor’s commitment is a signal to everyone deciding afterwards, and in Bilot’s case — a listing that went out days into the Covid crash — that signal is what kept the offering alive. Niemi is clear that the money could have come from anywhere and the endorsement could not.

The argument for listing that survives

Raising money is the reason usually given and the weakest one, since private capital is available. The durable arguments are a share that can be used to buy companies, an ownership base whose members are on different cycles, and a bank that treats a listed borrower differently.

Products from the bench

The most common trap in software consultancy: consultants between assignments are put to building a product, which therefore gets the hours nobody is paying for and stops whenever billable work appears. It never ships, and the sector repeats it constantly.

Watch

The recording lives on the Neuvottelija channel: Hallitustyö IPO & fuusio | Petri Niemi | Neuvottelija 123. A Finnish edition of this episode is published at www.neuvottelija.fi.

In depth

The Neuvottelija AI editions carry a long-form write-up of this episode: English · suomeksi.

Go deeper

Guides connected to this conversation, with frameworks and further reading.

People and topics

Guests: Petri Niemi

Topics: M&A & Exits SaaS & Software Ownership, Capital & Tax

AI and agent resources


Source and content status

Provenance: Finnish source: Owner page assembled from YouTube metadata, the neuvottelija.fi episode record and the publisher's own chapter marks, translated one for one. The marks are genuine: twenty-five of them, with gaps from 43 to over 200 seconds, tracking the recording rather than a grid. No transcript is published here — the channel has no English caption track for this episode and the Finnish one is YouTube's automatic track. The guest chairs or has chaired the boards of most of the listed companies he discusses by name, and the Bilot–Vincit merger was awaiting shareholder approval when this was recorded, so the episode discusses a live transaction from one side. Nothing in it is investment advice, and the company assessments are those of February 2022.. English subtitles: not available on this page; this is an episode summary, not a curated transcript. QA coverage 0% (metadata only). Original episode: neuvottelija.fi. Imported 2026-09-20 · last reviewed 2026-09-20. Passages the source audio left genuinely ambiguous are marked [unclear] rather than guessed.