Neuvottelija.com

Episode 136 · 2022-05-07 · 44:29 · Original in Finnish

Northern IPOs: Norrhydro and LapWall | Yrjö Trög and Jarmo Pekkarinen | Negotiator 136

Originally published as “Pohjoisen listautujat Norrhydro LapWall | Yrjö Trög Jarmo Pekkarinen | Neuvottelija 136”

Two Northern Finnish First North listings at the same table, six months after the offering. Yrjö Trög of Norrhydro and Jarmo Pekkarinen of LapWall explain how the price was set through anchor investors, why anchors were over-collected as insurance, and how scaling and the over-allotment option worked in practice: Norrhydro's 8 million euro offering drew 56 million in subscriptions and LapWall's was 8.8 times oversubscribed. Also here: NorrDigi's promise for the electrification of hydraulics, LapWall's LEKO system and its 70 per cent share of warm roof elements, a failed export push into Sweden, and why construction is fifty years behind other industries.

Guests: Yrjö Trög, Jarmo Pekkarinen · Host: Sami Miettinen

Core theses

  1. The anchor investor meetings, not the roadshow, decided both offerings — the price was effectively set before the retail book opened.
  2. Over-collecting anchors is insurance against the book failing, and it is paid for in scaling that annoys everyone who subscribed.
  3. An electric motor does not replace hydraulics; NorrDigi's claim is about making the hydraulics electric, which is a different and narrower proposition.
  4. Construction lags other industries by decades because its products are not standard, and factory production requires standard products before it requires automation.

Watch and listen

Watch on YouTube JSON Markdown

Key moments

  1. 00:00 — The guests, Yrjö Trög and Jarmo Pekkarinen, introduce themselves
  2. 00:53 — What Norrhydro does in Rovaniemi
  3. 01:46 — Hydraulic cylinders, and NorrDigi's future value
  4. 02:50 — LapWall, and the trademark fight over the LEKO name
  5. 03:20 — Timber elements, and construction moving into factories
  6. 04:02 — What sizes the elements and the cylinders come in
  7. 05:02 — How the share price has moved since listing
  8. 06:10 — Anchor investors and pricing the offering
  9. 07:12 — Scaling back, the over-allotment option and an 8.8 times oversubscription
  10. 08:11 — People's shares, and thousands of new owners
  11. 08:39 — Where the name LapWall came from
  12. 09:27 — Pyhäntä, and the listed companies of Northern Finland
  13. 09:56 — Why the new factory stayed in Rovaniemi
  14. 10:53 — The small-town philosophy in the engineering industry
  15. 11:31 — LapWall's acquisitions in Pälkäne and Veteli
  16. 13:17 — A 70 per cent market share in warm roof elements
  17. 14:14 — Walls and roofs weatherproofed by a single supplier
  18. 14:48 — Airports and Wärtsilä as references
  19. 15:32 — The Motiomax deal and Norrhydro's acquisition strategy
  20. 16:44 — Norrhydro's customer segments, and NorrDigi's role
  21. 17:45 — Why an electric motor does not replace hydraulics
  22. 19:31 — Electrification and NorrDigi's market potential
  23. 20:06 — The long design cycles of machine builders
  24. 20:35 — LapWall's Swedish expedition, and what it taught
  25. 22:37 — Export readiness, and the size of the Finnish market
  26. 23:23 — Culture eats strategy for breakfast
  27. 23:33 — Experiences in Korea, and the Asian market
  28. 24:49 — The Rovaniemi factory serves Europe
  29. 25:17 — Exporting through Finnish customer relationships
  30. 25:45 — Fragmentation in construction, and the dishonest operators
  31. 26:15 — A Ponsse background, and Einari's book
  32. 26:49 — Entrepreneurship and the stock exchange together
  33. 27:14 — Norrhydro is looking for a new chief executive
  34. 27:50 — LapWall's ownership base, and professional management
  35. 28:51 — A target of 70 million in revenue by 2026
  36. 29:17 — The modular experiment, and why the world was not ready
  37. 30:46 — Construction is fifty years behind other industries
  38. 31:17 — Standard products as the precondition for factory production
  39. 31:47 — Offering proceeds going into digital technology and automation
  40. 32:07 — House factories against a product industry company
  41. 33:35 — What the prototype did to production volume
  42. 33:54 — Customer tailoring, and outsourcing by machine builders
  43. 35:07 — A complete system with intelligence in it, at five times the price
  44. 36:28 — Automation in the new factory, and lean flow
  45. 37:30 — Flexibility in mixed-series production
  46. 38:38 — What they would do differently in the listing
  47. 39:22 — Unnecessary documentation, and digital marketing
  48. 40:07 — The anchor investor meetings decided the offering
  49. 40:58 — LapWall's offering in a falling market
  50. 42:07 — Thirty per cent of the staff are shareholders
  51. 42:33 — The cost of listing, and the missing concept
  52. 43:17 — The nerve to press the button in an uncertain world
  53. 43:49 — Closing words and thanks

Summary

Two Northern Finnish First North listings at the same table, six months after the offering. Yrjö Trög of Norrhydro and Jarmo Pekkarinen of LapWall explain how the price was set through anchor investors, why anchors were over-collected as insurance, and how scaling and the over-allotment option worked in practice: Norrhydro’s 8 million euro offering drew 56 million in subscriptions and LapWall’s was 8.8 times oversubscribed. Also here: NorrDigi’s promise for the electrification of hydraulics, LapWall’s LEKO system and its 70 per cent share of warm roof elements, a failed export push into Sweden, and why construction is fifty years behind other industries.

The book was closed before it opened

Both offerings were effectively priced in the anchor investor meetings. By the time the public book opened, the number that mattered had been agreed with a handful of institutions — which is why an 8.8 times oversubscription tells you about demand at a price someone else set, not about what the market would have paid.

Insurance you pay for in scaling

Collecting more anchors than the offering needs protects against the book falling short. The cost lands on everyone who subscribed and got a fraction, and the guests are candid that the trade was made deliberately rather than as an accident of demand.

Standard products come first

The claim that construction trails other industries by fifty years gets a specific explanation here: factory production requires a standard product, and construction sells bespoke ones. Automation is downstream of that, which is why buying machinery has not closed the gap for anyone.

Watch

The recording lives on the Neuvottelija channel: Pohjoisen listautujat Norrhydro LapWall | Yrjö Trög Jarmo Pekkarinen | Neuvottelija 136. A Finnish edition of this episode is published at www.neuvottelija.fi.

In depth

The Neuvottelija AI editions carry a long-form write-up of this episode: English · suomeksi.

Go deeper

Guides connected to this conversation, with frameworks and further reading.

People and topics

Guests: Yrjö Trög, Jarmo Pekkarinen

Topics: Investing & Markets Ownership, Capital & Tax M&A & Exits

AI and agent resources


Source and content status

Provenance: Finnish source: Owner page assembled from YouTube metadata, the neuvottelija.fi episode record and the publisher's own chapter marks, translated one for one. The marks are genuine: fifty-three of them, with gaps from ten seconds to nearly two minutes, tracking the recording rather than a grid. No transcript is published here — the channel has no English caption track for this episode and the Finnish one is YouTube's automatic track. Both guests led companies that had listed six months earlier and are describing their own offerings and their own share price; the episode is promotional in that respect and nothing in it is investment advice. Norrhydro's share offering event is the one produced by the guests of EP141 of this same programme. Figures, targets and ownership are those of spring 2022.. English subtitles: not available on this page; this is an episode summary, not a curated transcript. QA coverage 0% (metadata only). Original episode: neuvottelija.fi. Imported 2026-09-20 · last reviewed 2026-09-20. Passages the source audio left genuinely ambiguous are marked [unclear] rather than guessed.