1
00:00:00,020 --> 00:00:06,740
But Merja is still in a position where she really should know what these 'safer space' guidelines actually are.

2
00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:13,140
She should know that these come from intersectional feminism. These are politically loaded guidelines.

3
00:00:13,380 --> 00:00:21,480
It's just that the Yle Act is written so sloppily — frankly, it's an unbelievably terrible law — that it allows for pretty much anything.

4
00:00:21,480 --> 00:00:25,580
I wonder why our colleagues aren't saying anything.

5
00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:32,960
Alright, welcome to the Neuvottelija channel. My guests today are Sanna Ukkola and Ivan Puopolo. Hey there.

6
00:00:33,340 --> 00:00:33,680
Hi, hi.

7
00:00:34,140 --> 00:00:42,720
Yle's CEO Merja Ylä-Anttila used the words 'information influencing' and maybe even 'information war' in her internal pep talk.

8
00:00:43,020 --> 00:00:47,380
So Yle at least feels like it's under threat, and we thought we'd talk about it.

9
00:00:47,500 --> 00:01:01,940
Couldn't you say that, from Yle's point of view, you're actually the one who started this 'information influencing,' Sanna, with your Iltalehti exposé on inclusion and Yle's questionable practices?

10
00:01:02,530 --> 00:01:14,460
Well, actually it was Ilta-Sanomat that wrote about it roughly a week before me — that some Yle journalist had gotten a note saying he'd had too many straight men in his interviews.

11
00:01:14,580 --> 00:01:21,260
I'd also talked with my colleagues, former Yle people — since I was there myself for ten years, I know a lot of people.

12
00:01:22,980 --> 00:01:32,060
I'd heard similar things — like one colleague being told that every third interviewee should be a representative of some ethnic minority group.

13
00:01:32,980 --> 00:01:37,480
They hadn't forced him into it, because he'd refused and cited journalistic reasons.

14
00:01:37,540 --> 00:01:49,720
But still I thought, what on earth is this — that you'd pick interviewees based on skin color, when interviewees should be chosen for journalistic reasons.

15
00:01:49,810 --> 00:01:56,320
And I asked if he had any document or something I could see, any data.

16
00:01:56,490 --> 00:02:05,000
And then I got to see this DEI training, which was actually pretty appalling, frankly.

17
00:02:05,140 --> 00:02:33,340
Yle denied it, saying this isn't mandatory and isn't done. At the same time we have a parliamentary working group looking at Yle's mission and especially its outrageous nearly 600-million-euro funding. Ivan Puopolo, on your weekly show we've talked many times, appalled at exactly these euros — isn't it something, 1,500 journalists, 2,800 people, 600 million euros, of which 100 million goes to outsourced subcontracting and 500 million gets spent on their own stuff.

18
00:02:33,740 --> 00:02:52,720
Actually very little is known about it, and you too stuck your spoon in the soup by inviting Sanna and that Lloyd Libison, and you discussed whether it's really true that Yle has mandatory or near-mandatory trainings — and this wasn't just some random jump into the discussion for you either.

19
00:02:52,780 --> 00:02:55,980
Yeah, well, Lloyd Libison revealed all kinds of things there.

20
00:02:56,500 --> 00:02:59,580
Among other things, that some of them are mandatory — up until then that had been denied.

21
00:02:59,940 --> 00:03:03,960
It's so murky, or the answers are so vague and murky,

22
00:03:04,060 --> 00:03:08,040
that it's hard to figure out what was said and when.

23
00:03:08,500 --> 00:03:11,840
And here's a quick commercial break — unlike at Yle,

24
00:03:12,060 --> 00:03:13,980
I have to fund this with ads too.

25
00:03:14,300 --> 00:03:16,100
What's the first thing that comes to mind when you think of mines?

26
00:03:16,300 --> 00:03:18,520
A dusty, cramped, maybe even dirty place.

27
00:03:18,580 --> 00:03:22,800
Well, did you know that in Kittilä gold is already being mined remotely using 5G?

28
00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:36,360
In FutuCast's new collaboration episode with Telia, Telia's 5G director Janne Koistinen explains that a private 5G network has been built into the mine shafts in Kittilä — one the size of a medium-sized Finnish town, so already quite a substantial setup.

29
00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:47,180
So the truth is that today's gold miner uses the latest technology in very well air-conditioned conditions, in comfortable office chairs, remotely operating mining machines.

30
00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:56,060
Beyond mines, developing network infrastructure enables ever-better data security and brings investment opportunities in new technologies.

31
00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:00,120
Are yesterday's sci-fi stories today's investment opportunities?

32
00:04:01,140 --> 00:04:08,100
Go listen to FutuCast's collaboration episode with Telia on Spotify and hear more about the project and how 5G is being used.

33
00:04:08,100 --> 00:04:09,300
And back to the episode.

34
00:04:09,460 --> 00:04:12,980
Now it's come out that some of them are mandatory and some aren't.

35
00:04:13,860 --> 00:04:24,200
And at first it was said that these DEI trainings don't extend to journalistic content, until it came out that they do extend to journalistic content.

36
00:04:24,340 --> 00:04:27,800
After which it was said, so what if they do extend to journalistic content.

37
00:04:28,420 --> 00:04:31,520
Of course it matters — if I put it briefly, from a journalistic standpoint.

38
00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:39,600
When there are goals other than the audience's truthful access to information, the audience develops a justified suspicion,

39
00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:47,680
as to whether they're being honestly told everything that doesn't lead toward that other goal of theirs,

40
00:04:47,740 --> 00:04:50,080
which in this case is this DEI [goal].

41
00:04:50,420 --> 00:04:55,780
But let me quickly add something about the funding side — Yle has a really murky, roundabout system.

42
00:04:56,420 --> 00:05:01,760
So Yle is a limited company, even though it runs one hundred percent on public money,

43
00:05:01,960 --> 00:05:04,600
just like the police or the judiciary or whatever else.

44
00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:08,560
But because it's a limited company, it's bound by the Limited Liability Companies Act.

45
00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:19,160
And this Companies Act means Yle doesn't have to disclose its budget and finances with the same level of detail that, say, the police have to.

46
00:05:19,380 --> 00:05:32,020
And the result is, since they have this automatic cash flow of 600 million coming in, and they don't really have to tell anyone exactly what the money's spent on, it just gets sprayed around on whatever.

47
00:05:32,840 --> 00:05:38,580
like the chair of the governing council's honeymoon — a 25th-anniversary honeymoon trip to Paris.

48
00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:43,140
Yeah, this definitely has traits of corruption and [unclear],

49
00:05:43,170 --> 00:05:48,380
so in a way, in my eyes, Yle's pile of money is divided into journalistic operations,

50
00:05:48,480 --> 00:05:52,740
where those 1,500 Yle journalists have gone through this diversity DEI training,

51
00:05:53,030 --> 00:06:02,600
so they know how to write contextually good stories and pick interviewees with the right range of skin colors and genders.

52
00:06:03,360 --> 00:06:09,460
but besides that there's also the media production side — like when drama or sports gets bought in, this extends there too,

53
00:06:09,610 --> 00:06:15,380
so in a way there are these drama guidelines being handed out — Ivan, you had an episode where there was this feminist dramaturge,

54
00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:22,300
so this runs through both the journalistic content — this diversity training works a bit differently there — and also into the other content, in a way,

55
00:06:22,350 --> 00:06:24,900
isn't that how it goes, and those are kind of two different baskets.

56
00:06:25,040 --> 00:06:43,060
Yeah, but the problem is exactly the same everywhere. In practice Yle has this social-policy goal, meaning improving the position of minorities in society. That can be a perfectly good goal, but it's a political goal regardless. That kind of thing belongs to politicians.

57
00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:53,940
And now that it's seeped into Yle's operations — not just journalism but also these drama contents and everything else — the automatic consequence is that it makes us suspicious.

58
00:06:54,520 --> 00:07:03,320
For example, Yle recently published a story saying that acts of violence against minorities have increased significantly.

59
00:07:03,420 --> 00:07:06,120
That was a sentence stated in the lede.

60
00:07:06,680 --> 00:07:11,760
And at no point in the story did the journalist present any evidence to support that claim.

61
00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:37,040
I get that news articles don't cite sources the same way a doctoral thesis does. We trust the journalist. But in this specific case, now that we know Yle has this DEI goal in the background, doubts arise — okay, are you being honest, where's the evidence, was this cherry-picked on purpose from somewhere, could this even be outright lying — show us the evidence now. That's the problem that follows from it.

62
00:07:37,140 --> 00:07:57,400
Yeah, you've both been at Yle, but going back a while, Sanna — you had that Teräsammallahti Native American headdress thing — that's kind of where it started, in a way, that if you joke about certain things with the wrong humor or tone, like Native American indigenous culture, it becomes a deadly serious matter.

63
00:07:57,630 --> 00:08:04,920
But has this always been the case at Yle — this certain kind of politicking, or diversity-goal thread running through things?

64
00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:19,440
That Native American headdress thing has nothing to do with this discussion, but no, it hadn't. When I was at Yle, there weren't goals of this kind. Back then the 50-50 thing came in — that half the people interviewed should be women.

65
00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:29,220
And I remember that me and one colleague were probably pretty loudly critical of it, saying this isn't journalistic.

66
00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:35,360
I also don't like — I never agreed to pick people based on gender either.

67
00:08:36,120 --> 00:08:40,520
But it got through anyway and now it's there.

68
00:08:41,050 --> 00:08:47,540
But for example in the series it's similar — that women should make up a third of the interviewees.

69
00:08:47,620 --> 00:08:53,480
but apparently they've now backed off from that a bit, because the system hasn't worked.

70
00:08:54,940 --> 00:09:00,800
People are interviewed for journalistic reasons, not because of identity politics.

71
00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:03,980
We're not [defined by] our gender or skin color.

72
00:09:04,960 --> 00:09:10,900
People don't represent some particular group — this is a horrifying idea to begin with,

73
00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:13,080
to group people this way.

74
00:09:13,630 --> 00:09:16,520
We are our thoughts and our skills and knowledge.

75
00:09:16,600 --> 00:09:34,240
Yeah, that's how it is — you two are represented too, Ivan, this Italian-Finnish immigrant, exotic color, and Sanna of course is a woman, but over 268 episodes I don't have anything like that in my lineup — I'm just racking up some inclusion points here, good, the universe is balanced now.

76
00:09:34,340 --> 00:09:45,660
I've never had anything like that. For example ten years ago, when I hosted Pressiklubi and invited people on — and there are a lot of political journalists there — they were very male-dominated.

77
00:09:46,160 --> 00:09:53,460
Because back then about 10 percent of political journalists were women, but now probably around 50 percent of political journalists are already women.

78
00:09:54,480 --> 00:10:01,540
Tomorrow I have three women and one man on my panel. Same last week, same the week before that.

79
00:10:02,080 --> 00:10:15,440
So these days I'm starting to have more women, but it comes organically — it doesn't come through any gender quotas or reward systems, it comes along as society changes, and the panels change with it.

80
00:10:15,620 --> 00:10:26,720
But Yle's explanations are completely contradictory the whole time — they clearly know these kinds of goals are non-journalistic, and that's why they initially tried to deny it, saying we don't have goals like this in our journalism.

81
00:10:26,740 --> 00:10:30,460
Jokinen: 'We think about everything except diversity.'

82
00:10:30,480 --> 00:10:47,060
And then when it did come out, they said, well, so what. And now they say this is a legal obligation. The law requires it. Okay, has the law changed? Because before 2018 these didn't really exist. The law hasn't changed one bit, so where did this obligation suddenly come from?

83
00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:57,080
Of course it doesn't require it. It's just that the Yle Act is written so sloppily — frankly it's an unbelievably terrible law — that it allows for pretty much anything.

84
00:10:57,080 --> 00:11:00,080
You can always say, okay, this is our public-service obligation.

85
00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:12,820
We've put it this way — when A-studio is the flagship and the best example of societal discussion there, then the question arises, okay, this really is public service,

86
00:11:12,940 --> 00:11:20,080
But why do you have all these shows like Au Pairs, Tits Out on the Beach, and Pussy Diaries and whatnot?

87
00:11:20,540 --> 00:11:24,880
Well, the logic is that in order for people to watch A-studio, you need these other things too.

88
00:11:25,350 --> 00:11:29,320
So that counts as public service too. So basically anything at all is public service.

89
00:11:29,700 --> 00:11:34,060
That's how it is, and it's like this — when money just keeps coming in, tens of millions a year,

90
00:11:34,070 --> 00:11:38,000
it gets stuffed somewhere, and at some point it starts going toward corporate-level fluff,

91
00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:41,720
like diversity trainings or the CEO's strategies,

92
00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:45,660
where a political direction is actually being sought for Yle's output.

93
00:11:46,340 --> 00:11:51,280
Maybe related to that, Lloyd Libison — he was also working at Yle,

94
00:11:51,600 --> 00:11:54,760
but as a subcontractor, and it's interesting that this Yle Oy

95
00:11:55,520 --> 00:12:00,380
ordered services from a small-scale subcontractor, but then when he essentially

96
00:12:00,420 --> 00:12:03,380
blew the whistle, in my opinion, and said this leadership has been lying,

97
00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:06,100
that yes, there have been near-mandatory trainings here,

98
00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:21,160
and a few other points — immediately he was suspended from his own show, then his immediate supervisor publicly criticized him, and now other media outlets have also been writing pretty condemning pieces, including about his book.

99
00:12:21,240 --> 00:12:31,620
Isn't there a bit of a pattern here — at least he's this small whistleblower, which is corny, by the way, since he's a Black man — there's a bit of a pile-on happening because you published this.

100
00:12:31,840 --> 00:12:42,580
The aggression directed at Lloyd Lipison has gotten downright ridiculous, not just on social media but also from journalists and columnists.

101
00:12:42,940 --> 00:12:53,760
For example Jyrki Lehtola wrote a completely tasteless column about Lipiso, and Helsingin Sanomat wrote a review of his book,

102
00:12:53,860 --> 00:12:58,080
which wasn't really a review of his book but a review of him, and it was absolutely crushing.

103
00:12:58,420 --> 00:13:00,120
And factual errors too.

104
00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:24,400
There were factual errors, and it was really outrageous. [unclear] this whole hype. It's purely connected to that. Lloyd Lipiso really has nothing to do with this whole discussion. It's just become personalized around him now. The same things he said in that interview with Ivan have come from everywhere else too, from all directions.

105
00:13:24,460 --> 00:13:37,120
Mainly what he said was that these trainings are mandatory. It's right there in Yle's annual report. It's documented that some of these trainings are mandatory. People are required to attend them.

106
00:13:37,260 --> 00:13:41,840
And then he talked about these 'safer space' guidelines, that Yle has these safer-space guidelines.

107
00:13:41,860 --> 00:13:45,500
Well, we already knew this from elsewhere — we have these guidelines in hand.

108
00:13:45,640 --> 00:13:53,040
He didn't really bring any new information, but he just said it with his own face on it, which is why it got pinned on him personally.

109
00:13:53,040 --> 00:14:02,440
But I have dozens of sources from inside Yle, and people who've worked at Yle, telling and leaking me these things — Libiso isn't the only one.

110
00:14:02,800 --> 00:14:06,280
And good that you're leaking this, but they still don't dare to do it under their own name.

111
00:14:06,380 --> 00:14:18,180
But could you say that not all of Yle's 2,800 employees share the line of Yle's management and editorial leadership, and are rebelling at least in this way, by telling you things from inside the company?

112
00:14:18,180 --> 00:14:25,840
Yeah, and right now I'm actually hearing from several sources that they're afraid of getting caught, because they see what's happening to Libiso.

113
00:14:25,840 --> 00:14:34,440
Then there are starting to be manager-level people on the intranet saying that whoever's leaking these things should be fired.

114
00:14:35,560 --> 00:14:39,320
And, like, that kind of surveillance — a Stasi vibe.

115
00:14:39,400 --> 00:14:42,220
The information war's first wave of mobilization.

116
00:14:42,220 --> 00:14:43,860
So, they're scared right now.

117
00:14:43,900 --> 00:14:47,820
And when you listened to the briefing Merja Ylä-Anttila gave to her own staff,

118
00:14:47,820 --> 00:14:51,340
she not only brought up this term 'information war,'

119
00:14:51,540 --> 00:14:55,260
she also clearly didn't just hint at it, but said outright,

120
00:14:55,380 --> 00:15:03,240
that the video clips originally leaked from Yle that Sanna published would be illegal.

121
00:15:03,900 --> 00:15:07,240
that you had done something illegal in publishing those videos.

122
00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:11,100
I've been a journalist for probably over a decade now,

123
00:15:11,140 --> 00:15:12,520
and I really do know this law.

124
00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:13,820
There's nothing illegal about it.

125
00:15:13,920 --> 00:15:15,460
It falls within the right of quotation.

126
00:15:16,000 --> 00:15:17,600
It's complete nonsense.

127
00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:21,040
But the fact that she's saying — implying — that I acted illegally,

128
00:15:21,080 --> 00:15:22,720
hinting at it, without using my name,

129
00:15:23,939 --> 00:15:25,200
in front of her three thousand subordinates.

130
00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:26,500
That I'd done something illegal.

131
00:15:26,520 --> 00:15:27,760
I'd like to ask Merja Ylä-Anttila,

132
00:15:27,880 --> 00:15:29,580
could you specify exactly what I've done.

133
00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:33,860
Plus, there's also the—

134
00:15:33,900 --> 00:15:42,500
In my opinion, outright false information is being spread to staff — that publishing videos which actually fall under the right of quotation would be illegal.

135
00:15:43,140 --> 00:15:47,980
That means some journalist listening in there might think, ah, so you're not allowed to do that.

136
00:15:48,920 --> 00:15:56,580
So it leads to his case — he ends up withholding information from the public, for example, because he thinks it would be illegal to publish.

137
00:15:56,720 --> 00:16:13,760
Yeah, I can well imagine that in Merja Ylä-Anttila's head she's building this rallying-cry feeling — us against them, we'll win this fight — but that requires everyone to be loyal to her, nothing gets leaked here, or you'll end up like Lloyd Lipiso — things go really badly, look right there.

138
00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:30,460
She said flat out, don't give these stories to Iltalehti, don't leak to Iltalehti. She even used the word Iltalehti — talk to her instead. And my sources asked, how are you even supposed to speak up inside there when that's the atmosphere.

139
00:16:30,540 --> 00:16:41,460
Right, there's a funny thing connected to this — Yle's protective mechanism, how it works. This might be a bit technical, but a limited company can have three kinds of management elements, so to speak.

140
00:16:42,620 --> 00:16:54,280
The CEO, the board, and the governing council. And Yle has all three in use. Most limited companies probably don't have a governing council, because it's this kind of social club that doesn't actually do anything.

141
00:16:55,240 --> 00:17:00,200
It's full of politicians who don't understand a thing about journalism, except Susanne Päivärintä does understand.

142
00:17:00,500 --> 00:17:02,060
But the politicians there don't get it.

143
00:17:02,560 --> 00:17:06,100
Right, but the key thing here is that this governance thing is basically playacting.

144
00:17:06,360 --> 00:17:09,400
The whole time it's pretend that this governing council is the body overseeing Yle.

145
00:17:09,860 --> 00:17:14,780
So when unpleasant news about Yle comes out and people want to find out whether everything's actually in order,

146
00:17:15,130 --> 00:17:19,339
they say, alright, CEO, go report to the governing council on how things are going.

147
00:17:19,770 --> 00:17:25,020
And since the governing council is itself part of the leadership, it's actually a beneficiary of Yle.

148
00:17:25,160 --> 00:17:33,960
The governing council members get something like 12 grand a year as compensation for being on the council, plus of course every now and then a honeymoon trip to Paris, and so on.

149
00:17:34,500 --> 00:17:43,140
Now this body supposedly oversees Yle. It's exactly like saying to Merja Ylä-Anttila, hey, we heard there are problems in your company.

150
00:17:43,420 --> 00:17:46,960
Go find out if that's true and then give us a report on whether it holds up.

151
00:17:47,260 --> 00:17:51,420
That's exactly what the governing council is. Nobody's really overseeing Yle at all.

152
00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:55,240
Except the media, which also doesn't oversee it.

153
00:17:55,280 --> 00:17:57,500
No, I don't dare write about it.

154
00:17:57,500 --> 00:18:00,220
People just yell at me and Ivan about this.

155
00:18:01,279 --> 00:18:03,040
I wouldn't want to talk about this.

156
00:18:03,100 --> 00:18:06,140
This is really awkward and extremely unpleasant.

157
00:18:06,640 --> 00:18:11,420
Especially since I've been at Yle myself, and Ivan's been there too, and all of us have connections there.

158
00:18:11,600 --> 00:18:12,720
We don't want to be doing this.

159
00:18:13,300 --> 00:18:19,560
But everyone's staying quiet, probably because they want to secure their own job there in the future.

160
00:18:19,560 --> 00:18:21,880
It's such an enormous, massive employer.

161
00:18:21,920 --> 00:18:32,560
Same with politicians. Politicians, with a few exceptions, don't really criticize Yle much, because they want to stay on good terms with Yle — because they want airtime there.

162
00:18:32,680 --> 00:18:34,220
They've all got a honeymoon trip coming up.

163
00:18:34,220 --> 00:18:42,700
Right, and politically it's also tricky, because ownership responsibility doesn't really materialize either — the government has no direct control over Yle.

164
00:18:42,800 --> 00:18:49,320
It's somehow been outsourced to a parliamentary working group, where the opposition has the same weight as the government side.

165
00:18:49,340 --> 00:18:53,520
meaning all the parties have to agree on Yle's funding,

166
00:18:54,120 --> 00:18:57,220
which makes it harder than amending the constitution.

167
00:18:57,380 --> 00:19:01,720
So even amending the constitution is easier than changing Yle.

168
00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:08,740
So it's just this massive, 600-million-euro pile of ownerless money,

169
00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:10,940
that nobody oversees. Just incomprehensible.

170
00:19:11,240 --> 00:19:16,300
And then we get criticized for talking about the journalistic side of it.

171
00:19:16,760 --> 00:19:21,220
I, for example, haven't weighed in on the funding debate at any point, because to me that's a completely separate discussion.

172
00:19:21,440 --> 00:19:24,980
I don't want to take a stance on that. I talk about journalism, I talk about media.

173
00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:31,520
Yeah, that's right. But on top of Yle having this kind of automatic funding with no oversight at all — that's actually illegal.

174
00:19:31,540 --> 00:19:37,320
The whole setup is illegal. From a competition-law standpoint — EU competition law, that is.

175
00:19:37,540 --> 00:19:45,740
EU competition law states very clearly that the state can't produce anything involving economic activity — commercial economic activity.

176
00:19:46,380 --> 00:19:48,880
Except with a special exemption, but still.

177
00:19:49,270 --> 00:19:51,540
And Yle breaks all sorts of EU competition rules.

178
00:19:51,540 --> 00:19:53,600
It's blindingly obvious that it violates these laws.

179
00:19:54,260 --> 00:19:57,280
But there's nothing — well, there's the EU Commission, where you can file a complaint.

180
00:19:57,370 --> 00:20:00,740
And Sanoma has actually done that, and there are other complaints currently pending there too.

181
00:20:01,140 --> 00:20:03,640
When they eventually come through, there'll definitely be a ruling.

182
00:20:03,980 --> 00:20:08,540
Well, it's not a court, but a formal directive will come out of it.

183
00:20:09,640 --> 00:20:14,920
So in every way, the whole Yle setup is just an incomprehensible amateur outfit.

184
00:20:15,260 --> 00:20:27,640
Exactly for these reasons. And going back to this parliamentary working group — right now the situation is that a majority of citizens think Yle's funding should be cut, that their tax money is just being squandered on whatever there.

185
00:20:28,400 --> 00:20:44,260
That's partly probably tied to Yle's politicization too — citizens are fed up, they don't want to watch this politicized use of tax money — but they can't cut it, they can't pull it off, because it requires unanimous agreement among all the parties.

186
00:20:44,660 --> 00:20:59,140
Yeah, I'll sign onto that — well, it kind of loops back around, let's say 550 million worth of content that gets handed out to the market for free, most of which — of that 550 million — would probably happen commercially anyway.

187
00:20:59,280 --> 00:21:21,240
Of course the journalistic activity and the Finland-related cultural output probably wouldn't be commercial, but there are things like the hundred-million-euro purchases from film production companies, for instance, and that's, in my opinion, a pretty corruption-prone playing field — where, like we saw in this Lloyd Libison case too, if you break some rule, it's goodbye to your production relationship.

188
00:21:21,300 --> 00:21:27,060
so there are probably some pretty unhealthy directives coming from Yle, like 'make this kind of content and that kind.'

189
00:21:27,340 --> 00:21:31,620
And if on top of that you have these diversity goals, which turn into a political goal,

190
00:21:31,720 --> 00:21:34,300
those turn into content goals for the subcontractors too.

191
00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:38,080
In my opinion Yle is corrupted all the way down through that subcontracting chain too.

192
00:21:38,120 --> 00:21:43,700
Right, but I'd correct one thing there — journalistic content does get produced commercially too.

193
00:21:44,220 --> 00:21:47,660
So if we play out a scenario where Yle disappeared from the market entirely,

194
00:21:47,740 --> 00:21:54,160
then commercial companies would meet the journalistic demand that the audience wants.

195
00:21:54,530 --> 00:22:00,600
And sure, some small stuff would be left out, but the problem that would arise from not having Yle at all,

196
00:22:01,030 --> 00:22:09,400
is that in commercial companies there's always the risk of commercial interests bleeding into journalistic content.

197
00:22:10,080 --> 00:22:17,380
There are firewalls for exactly that reason — the editor-in-chief makes sure that sales and marketing never march into the newsroom, so to speak, and say,

198
00:22:17,460 --> 00:22:22,380
'go make this and that.' But we have no guarantee that these firewalls always hold.

199
00:22:22,380 --> 00:22:28,500
They can perfectly well leak too. And that's why you need a genuinely non-commercial company,

200
00:22:28,700 --> 00:22:31,600
one that never has any commercial interests at all. And that's Yle.

201
00:22:32,160 --> 00:22:38,360
But Yle doesn't need 600 million to carry out this mission — maybe 100 million or 150 would be enough.

202
00:22:40,139 --> 00:22:43,060
The budget for news and current affairs programming is actually 150 million.

203
00:22:43,160 --> 00:22:55,180
and then on top of that there's creative content, since journalistic content gets made there too, so let's say another twenty or thirty million on top — meaning Yle's journalistic content production budget is a bit under 200 million.

204
00:22:55,820 --> 00:23:06,860
By the way, I'll add this — this leads the so-called scoop statistics, meaning when you count which outlet produces the most scoops, it's usually Yle or Helsingin Sanomat, they alternate at the top.

205
00:23:06,900 --> 00:23:13,660
And how many scoops come in a year? A scoop means STT has cited that particular news story.

206
00:23:13,660 --> 00:23:15,260
Oh, is that what it actually means?

207
00:23:15,260 --> 00:23:20,740
That's the definition of a scoop. They produce around 130-140 scoops a year.

208
00:23:21,060 --> 00:23:32,500
And since the price tag of that production machinery is a bit under 200 million, that works out to about 1.2-1.3 million per scoop that we pay for Yle's scoops.

209
00:23:32,560 --> 00:23:37,920
For Hesari it's a completely different scale. We're talking about tens of times less money per scoop.

210
00:23:37,980 --> 00:23:48,620
So Yle's completely inefficient. Maybe Sanna, you could go back to this inclusion guideline thing — one of the leaks was specifically that these diversity spreadsheets have been kept.

211
00:23:48,740 --> 00:23:50,980
What kind of things were actually being logged there?

212
00:23:51,860 --> 00:24:01,860
This was from 2020, I think, four years ago — this spreadsheet, as I understand it, which I also had a copy of.

213
00:24:01,940 --> 00:24:07,400
It had ethnic background — whether they're Finnish, age, woman, man.

214
00:24:08,500 --> 00:24:16,620
I also have in my possession internal newsroom memos from various groups,

215
00:24:17,020 --> 00:24:22,700
in which they say they've kept spreadsheets on, among other things, people's bodies,

216
00:24:23,380 --> 00:24:24,680
what kind of body someone has.

217
00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:29,020
They've also been given training on what kind of body is allowed to appear in the media.

218
00:24:30,700 --> 00:24:35,360
opinions, ways of thinking, family relationships, absolutely everything.

219
00:24:35,980 --> 00:24:43,680
And the goal is probably to get that diversity, to sort of go beyond the population's normal range,

220
00:24:43,740 --> 00:24:50,200
so minorities get representation, even at the cost of journalistic choices and casting decisions.

221
00:24:50,580 --> 00:24:55,300
Right, and when I've listened to these DEI trainers' material, what's been published in Ilta-Sanomat for example,

222
00:24:55,780 --> 00:24:58,500
they're actually acting against journalistic principles.

223
00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:07,380
So for instance, take a training related to disability — there the trainer, and this is specifically the training session Libison talked about,

224
00:25:07,420 --> 00:25:19,600
there the trainer told the trainees, meaning the journalists, to think about how normally — that stories about disabled people tend to be told as sort of hero stories,

225
00:25:20,380 --> 00:25:27,620
when they carry out ordinary everyday tasks, like it's somehow amazing that they can do the same things able-bodied people can,

226
00:25:27,720 --> 00:25:38,580
so this trainer told the journalists to refrain from telling these hero stories, because not all disabled people necessarily like them.

227
00:25:39,010 --> 00:25:44,680
And this is completely wrong journalistically. You should never think about how the audience will react.

228
00:25:44,980 --> 00:25:55,980
That shouldn't factor into the judgment at all — instead you consider whether there's news value here, whether it's interesting, whether it's socially significant, and so on.

229
00:25:56,060 --> 00:26:04,020
And then if you conclude that yes, it is, you publish it regardless of how the audience reacts, whether someone likes it or not.

230
00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:12,900
And I'll just say this — in a situation like that, if there's a phenomenon where some disabled people don't like the hero stories being told about them,

231
00:26:12,940 --> 00:26:20,560
then the right approach isn't to stop telling hero stories, it's to do a story about that phenomenon — that some people don't like these stories.

232
00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:26,300
So in effect they were being told to suppress information, which is just plain wrong.

233
00:26:26,340 --> 00:26:35,000
And they've also gone — in that DEI training I saw, there was this Newslab thing — what is Newslab exactly?

234
00:26:35,400 --> 00:26:37,640
It's a kind of news development unit.

235
00:26:38,450 --> 00:26:44,280
So they'd gone to some immigrant neighborhoods to ask immigrants how stories about them should be made.

236
00:26:45,000 --> 00:26:48,560
So they asked the subjects themselves how they should be portrayed.

237
00:26:48,650 --> 00:26:52,240
And it was the same with gender minorities.

238
00:26:52,780 --> 00:26:58,560
They've also asked what gender minorities expect from Yle and how stories about them should be made.

239
00:26:59,140 --> 00:27:07,440
Which is, sure, a nice idea journalistically, but this really isn't social policy — this is supposed to be journalism.

240
00:27:07,460 --> 00:27:09,560
And it's not even a nice idea. When do they go?

241
00:27:10,340 --> 00:27:16,100
In general, sure, of course we want to treat gender minorities well, but we're talking about journalism here.

242
00:27:17,420 --> 00:27:27,660
And then there's also the thing that if you look at these young journalists, about 40 percent of journalists who've been in the field less than 10 years think,

243
00:27:28,260 --> 00:27:32,120
that the purpose of journalism is to change the world and make it better.

244
00:27:32,320 --> 00:27:34,680
And that, in a way, they're already operating agenda-first.

245
00:27:35,180 --> 00:27:41,220
And Matti Apunen, chairman of Yle's board, has commented on this himself and knows this statistic.

246
00:27:41,260 --> 00:27:45,040
And he talked about it and said this isn't okay, that this is mission-driven journalism.

247
00:27:45,420 --> 00:27:47,420
that this has nothing to do with journalism.

248
00:27:47,940 --> 00:27:53,960
If Matti Apunen knows this, and that journalists in general

249
00:27:53,960 --> 00:27:58,360
aren't particularly prejudiced toward minorities,

250
00:27:58,360 --> 00:28:01,840
but rather very sensitive — probably the most sensitive group of people

251
00:28:02,010 --> 00:28:06,780
you can find in Finland — do they really need, on that scale,

252
00:28:06,880 --> 00:28:08,020
that kind of training?

253
00:28:08,340 --> 00:28:11,260
That reminds me — again, not directly related —

254
00:28:11,420 --> 00:28:16,760
but Matti Apunen, Jouko Jokinen — there was that Matti Kuusela fabrication incident.

255
00:28:16,840 --> 00:28:21,300
We actually had a discussion about it with Ivan and Matti Virtanen,

256
00:28:21,320 --> 00:28:24,820
where both of them sort of defended the fabrication, in a way.

257
00:28:24,940 --> 00:28:31,160
I think this is kind of the same thing — that it's become acceptable to create a fantasy world,

258
00:28:31,360 --> 00:28:36,140
one that isn't the same as the real world, as long as it advances your wishful idealism about the world.

259
00:28:36,600 --> 00:28:39,940
It's a bit the same in this HSL fare-dodging thing.

260
00:28:40,180 --> 00:28:46,060
First they put it out a bit — former officials went to the media saying it's not good to ride without paying.

261
00:28:46,880 --> 00:28:51,760
Then someone gets offended on their behalf, hinting that it's not right toward the minority, that they specifically ride without paying.

262
00:28:52,110 --> 00:28:54,480
Then it gets pulled, and then it gets reinstated.

263
00:28:54,570 --> 00:29:00,680
This is just totally vapid and childish minority-protection stuff that really doesn't serve those minorities at all.

264
00:29:00,960 --> 00:29:08,360
Right, and honestly the journalistic rule there is really simple — minorities and majorities are people.

265
00:29:08,740 --> 00:29:10,720
You treat them as people, and nothing else.

266
00:29:11,310 --> 00:29:15,920
And here — I know it can be hard for people to understand —

267
00:29:15,920 --> 00:29:19,540
why you couldn't just go and ask sexual minorities, say.

268
00:29:20,140 --> 00:29:22,460
But maybe the understanding opens up like this.

269
00:29:22,460 --> 00:29:25,260
You also don't go ask the National Coalition Party how a story about them should be made.

270
00:29:25,260 --> 00:29:29,760
Or ask Aito avioliitto how they'd want us to report on their push

271
00:29:29,900 --> 00:29:34,600
for marriage to remain only between a man and a woman, or ask anti-abortion groups,

272
00:29:34,690 --> 00:29:36,560
or the Finnish Sisu group, or so on.

273
00:29:36,940 --> 00:29:53,280
I'll give you — I'll put it in Ricky Gervais's words, representing an extremely exclusive one-percent minority, or a middle-aged investment banker — I'd give you guidance to handle this with the utmost respect, and let me just mansplain everything, nice and obediently, that way.

274
00:29:53,420 --> 00:29:55,740
That's a journalistic guideline for you, on how I should be handled.

275
00:29:55,740 --> 00:29:55,860
Exactly.

276
00:29:56,580 --> 00:30:14,140
Yeah, but something like that — of course you can calibrate the interview situation, that's probably fine, if the journalist genuinely doesn't know how, say, trans people live, it can be good background knowledge for them — but it can't be that the journalistic angle of the interview is the interviewee's wishes.

277
00:30:14,260 --> 00:30:36,900
Right, and besides, I'm pretty sure those wishes are things like — don't offend them, don't portray them in a bad light, don't show stereotypes, can't do this, can't do that, have to use these and those terms, and so on. That's the wrong way of thinking. Instead you should think about what the audience needs, not what the interviewee needs — and then you're serving the audience, not the interviewee.

278
00:30:37,040 --> 00:30:48,600
Yeah, journalists call me quite a lot actually, but it's really tiresome. Even yesterday one called. They always want background, and then I give them a half-minute — not half-hour — mansplaining session on how this works.

279
00:30:48,700 --> 00:30:59,320
They never actually end up using the quote from me, which I find really annoying, but isn't this backgrounding thing still perfectly acceptable in a way — that background discussion?

280
00:30:59,360 --> 00:31:26,320
Of course. It's not about anything other than sticking to conveying truthful, balanced information to the audience. That's your only goal. Not whether someone out there gets offended, or whether the world becomes better or worse because of it. That doesn't matter at all. If the information is true and it's significant, then that's that — you publish it for the audience, period.

281
00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:43,240
Yeah, generally this leadership tier seems to keep fumbling and there's no consequence, but hasn't at least the editor-in-chief been a kind of transitional solution here, with a replacement coming fairly soon?

282
00:31:43,340 --> 00:31:53,260
But is Ylä-Anttila also getting close to retirement age here — is this actually a situation where the leadership's position is shaking?

283
00:31:53,340 --> 00:32:06,240
Right, well Jouko Jokinen is about to retire soon, and Panu Pokkinen is coming in — who's, in my opinion, considerably sharper than Jouko, to put it bluntly.

284
00:32:06,340 --> 00:32:15,180
And Ylä-Anttila is of course already at the age where people in the industry are wondering at what point she'll retire.

285
00:32:15,240 --> 00:32:29,240
I don't believe for a second that this is some project of Ylä-Anttila's, but I think she's a bit uninformed. I read on Merja's Facebook wall when she was explaining the safer-space guidelines.

286
00:32:29,360 --> 00:32:42,440
and she kind of wrote that, well, she doesn't really know what these safer-space guidelines are, but since young people have such a hard time, she let the young people put together guidelines like this themselves.

287
00:32:42,600 --> 00:32:50,420
But Merja is still in a position where she really should know what these safer-space guidelines actually are.

288
00:32:50,480 --> 00:32:54,200
She should know that these come from intersectional feminism.

289
00:32:54,380 --> 00:32:56,820
These are politically loaded guidelines.

290
00:32:57,240 --> 00:32:57,980
These aren't okay.

291
00:32:58,500 --> 00:33:00,360
If she doesn't know, she should find out.

292
00:33:00,700 --> 00:33:08,760
Right, but back to the point that there are no consequences for leadership — it's worth remembering that Yle's oversight body is the governing council,

293
00:33:08,920 --> 00:33:15,780
which is supposed to hand out those consequences — but lo and behold, the governing council's beneficiary and chairman

294
00:33:15,900 --> 00:33:26,940
after taking a 25th-anniversary honeymoon trip to Paris on taxpayers' money, upon returning gave a statement to the media

295
00:33:27,080 --> 00:33:30,340
about this DEI [matter], which was, practically speaking, word for word

296
00:33:30,520 --> 00:33:31,320
Word for word.

297
00:33:31,360 --> 00:33:35,740
the same as the one Yle's management had given about a month and a half earlier.

298
00:33:35,820 --> 00:33:43,980
'Porridges and gruels [mixed up]' was in the headline of Yle's four editors-in-chief's rebuttal to my piece, saying that things have now gotten all mixed up.

299
00:33:44,360 --> 00:33:50,180
And then he, Valle Heimo, used the exact same phrase, even — that porridges and gruels have gotten mixed up.

300
00:33:50,420 --> 00:33:55,700
And then, allegedly, that in this discussion diversity and multivocality had somehow gotten mixed up.

301
00:33:56,160 --> 00:33:56,600
It hasn't.

302
00:33:56,920 --> 00:33:58,900
And this is exactly the same as what these editors-in-chief [said].

303
00:33:59,340 --> 00:34:04,780
So he's repeating word for word what Yle's management said.

304
00:34:04,840 --> 00:34:27,179
Yeah, thinking about this governance structure — my very first conversation with Ivan, by the way, was about the difference between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome, it's a classic, we'll put the link here — and we debated it, and generally a normal person thought equality of opportunity is a healthy starting point, whereas equality of outcome is, in a way, forced.

305
00:34:27,730 --> 00:34:31,220
What do you mean, normal person? That's actually already a left-wing thing, come on.

306
00:34:32,679 --> 00:34:38,500
But Yle enforces this equality of outcome through the fact that this inclusion also applies to their employees,

307
00:34:38,500 --> 00:34:45,159
meaning if there are potentially two equally qualified people and one of them is just more 'suitable,' then that one gets chosen according to Yle's code.

308
00:34:45,780 --> 00:34:48,480
At the very least there's a strong suspicion that this could happen.

309
00:34:48,639 --> 00:34:52,919
Right, and it's not just Yle — a recommendation like this exists at, say, the City of Helsinki too, it's right there in Finnish law.

310
00:34:53,280 --> 00:34:54,720
So, an instruction to discriminate.

311
00:34:57,160 --> 00:34:59,500
Positive discrimination is always a form of discrimination.

312
00:34:59,860 --> 00:35:04,900
Yes, yes. At the City of Helsinki this has been in use since, I believe, around 2012.

313
00:35:05,520 --> 00:35:09,980
By the way, I'll say this — if there's a situation where you have two equally strong candidates,

314
00:35:10,110 --> 00:35:13,520
whatever the wording of the law is there, you're supposed to give preference to this,

315
00:35:13,690 --> 00:35:17,720
meaning giving priority to the person belonging to the underrepresented group.

316
00:35:19,160 --> 00:35:23,120
This is of course discrimination, but the right approach in a situation like that would be to let a draw decide.

317
00:35:23,280 --> 00:35:26,480
If there really are two equally-valued people, then you draw lots — flip a coin.

318
00:35:27,130 --> 00:35:28,040
That doesn't discriminate.

319
00:35:29,200 --> 00:35:48,260
But let me come back for a second to, say, some genuinely fair criticism — Lloyd Libison probably isn't the main character of this story, but he is a Black man and, by all these inclusion criteria, basically a poster child — and yet he's the one who gets kicked into the spotlight and put through the wringer.

320
00:35:48,340 --> 00:35:52,360
It really is strange — this internal irony just kind of explodes the whole horizon, in my opinion.

321
00:35:52,520 --> 00:36:12,760
Right, and I found it funny — Lehtola for instance, he's a fun guy and I consider it a great honor to make it into his columns or satirical pieces — but he hinted in there that Lloyd Libiso had somehow used us, or mainly me, on that podcast to sell his own book down the line.

322
00:36:12,880 --> 00:36:21,160
That topic caused this whole uproar. And then Lehtola said there that a more skeptical journalist would have, in a way, left something like that undone.

323
00:36:21,190 --> 00:36:30,900
That was his logic there. But by that logic, then, all of Helsingin Sanomat, MTV, Iltalehti, Iltasanomat, and Uusi Suomi — at least these come to mind —

324
00:36:31,430 --> 00:36:37,080
were non-skeptical, because they published the story, did follow-up pieces, and kept the uproar going.

325
00:36:37,900 --> 00:36:45,660
So is our media really this bad, that they all fell for this Lloyd Libison 'scam' the whole time?

326
00:36:45,760 --> 00:36:53,520
And that argument in general — I've written one book myself, and I know how much money you make from books in this country: basically nothing.

327
00:36:54,060 --> 00:36:55,320
It's basically zero.

328
00:36:55,460 --> 00:36:58,980
And on top of that, he lost his job at Yle too. Was it a profitable deal?

329
00:36:58,980 --> 00:37:01,480
It's extremely disadvantageous for him financially.

330
00:37:02,420 --> 00:37:17,340
That's true, but that also ties into this whole field a bit — the monthly salary Yle pays those fifteen hundred journalists, some of whom are probably subcontractors, those are probably the best jobs in the journalism field in Finland, so of course nobody wants to fall out of that.

331
00:37:17,560 --> 00:37:37,560
And then, possibly, if you're out there on the tough commercial side — like I have to run ads in between, which Yle doesn't have to do, and Sanoma and the others do too — then I kind of think they still hold onto this little dream: what if I got to go make this kind of content over there without any commercial constraints on it.

332
00:37:37,640 --> 00:37:42,280
where all the costs are covered and you don't have to sell it forward for a single euro.

333
00:37:42,700 --> 00:37:45,360
That's Yle's own kind of corrupted allure, in a way.

334
00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:49,340
You could think that journalists censor themselves,

335
00:37:49,440 --> 00:37:52,060
because they want to stay on good terms with people at Yle,

336
00:37:52,160 --> 00:37:54,340
but maybe they'd also like to become a Yle journalist themselves.

337
00:37:54,600 --> 00:37:56,280
Of course, that's pretty obvious.

338
00:37:56,380 --> 00:38:00,200
Plus there's just this purely human, psychological trait involved,

339
00:38:00,200 --> 00:38:02,820
where you're nice to your colleagues.

340
00:38:05,380 --> 00:38:13,800
I at least want to make this clear — I've said it before, but I'll say it now as plainly as possible — I know plenty of journalists at Yle.

341
00:38:13,970 --> 00:38:19,780
And they're damn good at what they do. This isn't in any way about criticizing Yle's journalists.

342
00:38:20,620 --> 00:38:26,360
It's more about management trying to steer those journalists toward non-journalistic choices.

343
00:38:26,710 --> 00:38:34,900
And they end up having to fight between those two — their own journalistic integrity and the pressure coming from management.

344
00:38:35,240 --> 00:38:42,840
I find it a bit funny, honestly, that there's someone like Ruben Stiller, who was on the Viiden jälkeen show and said — actually I called Ruben yesterday and talked with him about this.

345
00:38:43,200 --> 00:38:53,120
He said he hasn't experienced anything like this. Ruben is one of Yle's most well-known journalists, a long-time flagship-name journalist, one of Finland's most recognizable journalist brands.

346
00:38:53,430 --> 00:39:00,660
If he hasn't experienced a producer telling him he's got too many straight men, that doesn't mean someone else hasn't.

347
00:39:01,820 --> 00:39:13,460
And the fact that Ruben goes and — since I hadn't talked to him before, I told him now that I have quite a few of his colleagues telling me about this, who are afraid of getting caught.

348
00:39:13,970 --> 00:39:22,180
So to me it's kind of a strange move from Ruben, to go and declare that nothing like this exists at Yle, if he hasn't seen it himself.

349
00:39:22,930 --> 00:39:26,740
It's like me saying polar bears don't exist because I've never seen one.

350
00:39:26,800 --> 00:39:31,580
Right, and then I remember Heikki Pursiainen has also criticized both of us.

351
00:39:31,820 --> 00:39:33,800
He was at Yle.

352
00:39:33,880 --> 00:39:35,460
[unclear]

353
00:39:35,560 --> 00:39:37,280
And this guy from Libera has gone completely off on his own lately.

354
00:39:37,280 --> 00:39:38,960
It's gone totally overboard.

355
00:39:38,960 --> 00:39:42,980
But he had a radio program at Yle about us, not really about the actual issue itself.

356
00:39:43,400 --> 00:39:51,540
Heikki Pursiainen is, I believe, a regular guest on several Yle programs, because his views are in tune with Yle's.

357
00:39:51,820 --> 00:39:59,320
But Pursiainen said he doesn't like this yapping, this attempt to show that Yle has a red-green agenda.

358
00:39:59,950 --> 00:40:10,360
I'm not trying to show that Yle has a red-green agenda — I'm saying there's crap mixed into Yle's journalistic principles that shouldn't be there.

359
00:40:10,760 --> 00:40:14,500
It doesn't matter whether it's red-green or blue-black or whatever color it is.

360
00:40:14,620 --> 00:40:19,100
That's not what matters — what matters is that those principles are being steered by something other than what they should be.

361
00:40:19,200 --> 00:40:22,120
And that's true, no matter what Pursiainen thinks about it.

362
00:40:22,120 --> 00:40:24,080
This is completely self-evident journalistically.

363
00:40:24,599 --> 00:40:26,140
Heikki Pursiainen isn't even a journalist.

364
00:40:26,150 --> 00:40:26,880
Yeah, I think so.

365
00:40:26,880 --> 00:40:31,220
That's what I wonder about — why our colleagues don't say anything.

366
00:40:31,860 --> 00:40:32,400
Why are they quiet?

367
00:40:32,570 --> 00:40:33,740
They come and tell me.

368
00:40:33,740 --> 00:40:34,980
They tell me privately.

369
00:40:35,390 --> 00:40:36,500
But why don't they say it publicly?

370
00:40:36,500 --> 00:40:38,080
Well, that's cancel culture.

371
00:40:38,080 --> 00:40:41,720
I've asked a couple of colleagues, actually more than a couple, why they're staying quiet.

372
00:40:42,420 --> 00:40:45,860
And even people who, say, write some kind of media column.

373
00:40:46,520 --> 00:40:53,040
one of them answers that because the Finns Party and the funding debate are in the air right now, they don't want to get branded as part of that Finns-Party corner.

374
00:40:53,380 --> 00:40:57,920
I really want to keep this discussion separate from the funding debate.

375
00:40:58,080 --> 00:41:03,480
Unfortunately these are happening at the same time, which is uncomfortable, but they're two different discussions.

376
00:41:03,700 --> 00:41:07,580
Another one says their health can't handle it.

377
00:41:07,900 --> 00:41:13,000
And, well, different reasons — they have friends at Yle and whatever, but there they are.

378
00:41:13,080 --> 00:41:17,980
Right, and then there's also that group of journalists who don't see any problem in it.

379
00:41:18,480 --> 00:41:23,280
Well, most of the people I've actually talked to — quite a few of them — they all do see it.

380
00:41:23,350 --> 00:41:24,480
They see the problem, okay.

381
00:41:24,660 --> 00:41:29,820
But I'll say one more thing about Pursiainen — he specifically wants to steer the discussion toward funding.

382
00:41:30,110 --> 00:41:32,920
And on that he has really good ideas.

383
00:41:33,290 --> 00:41:36,000
I really do agree with him on practically all of that.

384
00:41:36,100 --> 00:41:45,980
He just doesn't want to talk about the journalistic side of things, or he basically says that this supposed phenomenon doesn't even exist — that something has leaked into journalism.

385
00:41:47,510 --> 00:41:58,340
Or he says we're dealing with trivial nitpicking — like, if somewhere at Yle Kioski at some point there was some DEI guideline, so what?

386
00:41:58,420 --> 00:42:12,940
And this too, by the way — since Libison has been talked about, and then there was Jesse Sarkkinen in your interview, and both of them were from the Yle Kioski and Yle X side, the youth side — a lot of people now have this misconception that this is somehow purely a youth-programming issue, which it isn't.

387
00:42:13,300 --> 00:42:17,520
My sources, for example, are from all over the place — I don't have any youth-side sources at all.

388
00:42:17,820 --> 00:42:21,300
So it probably stands out more on the youth side, but it's just as much there on the news side.

389
00:42:22,560 --> 00:42:25,480
I have several sources on the news and current affairs side.

390
00:42:25,500 --> 00:42:31,360
Plus we've got that video clip where it's said out loud, straight from Yle itself.

391
00:42:31,540 --> 00:42:42,720
But this omertà, this code of silence here, where nobody comes forward with their own face but tells you things under source protection — I think that gets exaggerated, because two-way social media is basically dead now.

392
00:42:42,940 --> 00:42:46,700
so on X you can hardly get pile-on-harassed anymore, and if someone rattles off columns about you,

393
00:42:46,710 --> 00:42:50,340
so what. There's not much to be afraid of there.

394
00:42:50,460 --> 00:42:55,140
In my opinion people could grow a pair, if they've kind of

395
00:42:55,180 --> 00:42:59,380
maybe that's a poor choice of words, but get a bit braver and also, under their own name,

396
00:42:59,540 --> 00:43:00,000
offer some criticism.

397
00:43:00,350 --> 00:43:03,340
Actually I've done a lot of media criticism, because I too have

398
00:43:03,360 --> 00:43:08,400
hosted Pressiklubi and I speak with the deep chest-voice of experience.

399
00:43:08,680 --> 00:43:16,020
There isn't much of it — our media is really bad at criticizing itself and talking about itself in general.

400
00:43:16,420 --> 00:43:23,340
That kind of two-way discussion — even when you do see those conversations, what's actually being said there is somehow just kind of foolish.

401
00:43:23,340 --> 00:43:30,140
And taunting from anonymous accounts, and you probably get DMs or anonymous messages, but I honestly don't get anything negative.

402
00:43:30,140 --> 00:43:33,240
And it's always easy to respond two-way, even to trolls.

403
00:43:33,460 --> 00:43:36,560
Somehow there's this fear of public shaming, in a way,

404
00:43:36,640 --> 00:43:39,060
of cancellation and two-way communication — way too much.

405
00:43:39,420 --> 00:43:40,460
That's mostly gone now, honestly.

406
00:43:40,920 --> 00:43:43,840
So a few years ago there was real cancellation,

407
00:43:43,840 --> 00:43:46,060
where you'd lose your job instantly over some offhand remark

408
00:43:46,140 --> 00:43:49,000
or a radical opinion that went against the consensus.

409
00:43:49,200 --> 00:43:50,760
I don't think that exists anymore.

410
00:43:50,860 --> 00:43:50,980
Right.

411
00:43:52,220 --> 00:43:55,900
Yeah, but let's hope Yle recovers from this,

412
00:43:56,020 --> 00:44:00,819
learns its lesson and opens up, and then gives up some of its power

413
00:44:00,840 --> 00:44:06,020
and a sensible portion of its budget, and journalism gets its honor back,

414
00:44:06,020 --> 00:44:12,760
but Yle is now a limited company, and in my opinion it receives the biggest corporate subsidy in Finland.

415
00:44:12,760 --> 00:44:16,740
You could think of it as a subsidy in a different sense, because while it does provide public service itself,

416
00:44:16,740 --> 00:44:21,080
it also takes up a huge amount of room in the commercial market.

417
00:44:21,900 --> 00:44:26,220
There was that Stora Enso freshwater pearl mussel scandal — and there too, when there was a subcontractor involved,

418
00:44:26,280 --> 00:44:42,680
it was immediately Stora Enso's fault for all these subcontractors' actions. Yle is definitely trying to control that entire subcontractor chain with a really iron fist. Everyone making content for them is under pretty tight direction.

419
00:44:42,760 --> 00:44:57,880
Right, and maybe there's also that side — how much, in that hundred-million-euro purchase of production in Finland, there's a kind of bowing and scraping to Yle's wishes, making content specifically tailored to what Yle wants, because that's huge money on the commercial side.

420
00:44:58,300 --> 00:45:02,140
So people who don't actually work at Yle, but who get that hundred million worth of commissioned work.

421
00:45:03,640 --> 00:45:06,360
Right, you mean these subcontractors, like production companies.

422
00:45:06,440 --> 00:45:16,440
Right, say it's Yellow Films or whoever else that does productions — is there always this fear in the back of their mind that if they don't properly please Yle's line, next year those five-million-euro commissions are gone?

423
00:45:16,440 --> 00:45:20,640
But they have these feminist pocket dramaturges and whatnot that they then have to fill quotas for.

424
00:45:23,020 --> 00:45:34,580
And it's not even just that — at Yle, if you go pitch Yle a TV program, there's this DOCS form you have to fill out, and it asks in detail about everything, like how many,

425
00:45:34,640 --> 00:45:42,000
how you've ensured the position of minorities in the production team, and there's all sorts of these background questionnaires.

426
00:45:42,590 --> 00:45:52,780
And I know these small production companies are, in a way, in trouble — like, where are they supposed to find a Black gay editor to edit this material?

427
00:45:53,310 --> 00:46:01,260
So the requirements themselves are absolutely absurd, they're contradictory — first you're not allowed to assume gender, but then you still have to count how many women and men there are,

428
00:46:01,360 --> 00:46:14,500
It's really just an utterly nonsensical religion, which has now been extended so far that everyone has to bow down to it, even though there's no sense in it at all.

429
00:46:15,000 --> 00:46:31,000
Yeah. Well, free speech is being threatened by Finland's biggest media player, Yle — I wouldn't have believed we'd see this day, but hopefully this scrutiny now — truth is the best disinfectant, as people say — brings some order to this Yle house.

430
00:46:31,300 --> 00:46:39,280
Even though they themselves don't want to open up, it's probably good that you and other outlets are pulling back a bit of that veil of mystery there.

431
00:46:40,560 --> 00:46:43,840
Thank you both — my guests today have been Ivan Puopolo and Sanna Ukkola.

432
00:46:43,940 --> 00:46:51,539
I'd suggest we head over to the Inner Circle side and talk more about some media topic.

433
00:46:52,200 --> 00:46:57,700
I could imagine maybe cancel culture and 'woke' as a topic

434
00:46:57,700 --> 00:47:00,160
could be one theme we could discuss with you,

435
00:47:00,160 --> 00:47:02,160
briefly, just for subscribers. Would that work?

436
00:47:03,050 --> 00:47:03,140
Yeah.