{"title": "The Great Reset 2.0 | Tuomas Malinen | Negotiator 114", "titleOriginal": "The Great Reset 2.0 | Tuomas Malinen | Neuvottelija 114", "episodeNumber": "114", "guest": "Tuomas Malinen", "publishedAt": "2021-12-23", "duration": "39:29", "durationIso": "PT39M29S", "youtube": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9Kx_zQEV1M", "fiCanonical": "https://www.neuvottelija.fi/fi/episodes/140-the-great-reset-20-tuomas-malinen-neuvottelija-114", "originalLanguage": "fi", "format": "full", "topics": ["free_speech_society", "geopolitics"], "description": "A sequel to the previous year's episode, watched more than a hundred and twenty thousand times, in which Tuomas Malinen goes back over which of his forecasts came true. The frame is the same: Acemoglu and Robinson's narrow corridor, in which democracy emerges from a balance between a despotic state and civil society. The carrying argument is constitutional rather than medical — if a level can be placed above the constitution by decree, on which the population is then sorted, Malinen's view is that it will be used again in another context. The host says openly that he changed his own position two weeks earlier and sets out where he disagrees with his guest.", "chapters": [], "sourceTranscriptType": "none", "subtitleMethod": "none", "provenance": "Owner page assembled from YouTube metadata and the neuvottelija.fi episode record. No chapter marks are published here: the publisher's list holds only two marks, at 0:00 and 0:59, and it is a split of the show-note text rather than a chapter list, so republishing it would assert timestamps that do not hold. No transcript is published either — the channel has no English caption track for this episode and the Finnish one is YouTube's automatic track. This is a contested episode and the page does not smooth that over: 'the Great Reset' is a term with a substantial conspiratorial literature attached to it, the claims about constitutional rights and pandemic measures are the guest's own and are disputed, and no one holding the opposing view is present. The host states his own disagreement in the episode. Recorded 23 December 2021.", "coreTheses": ["The argument is about constitutional precedent rather than about any health measure, and conflating the two is what most of the surrounding debate did.", "Returning to score last year's forecasts is the episode's most defensible move, whatever one makes of the forecasts.", "The narrow corridor framing predicts that the danger is an imbalance in either direction, which is a stronger claim than the one usually attributed to it.", "The host disagreeing with the guest on air, and saying when he changed his own mind, is what keeps this from being a platform."], "slug": "ep114-the-great-reset-2-0-tuomas-malinen", "guestsCanonical": ["Tuomas Malinen"], "guestPages": ["https://www.neuvottelija.com/podcast/guests/tuomas-malinen/"], "page": "https://www.neuvottelija.com/podcast/episodes/ep114-the-great-reset-2-0-tuomas-malinen/", "markdown": "https://www.neuvottelija.com/podcast/episodes/ep114-the-great-reset-2-0-tuomas-malinen/index.md", "captions": null, "transcript": null, "videoId": "U9Kx_zQEV1M", "dbId": null, "qaCoveragePct": 0.0, "qaSemanticVerdict": "metadata_only", "aiArticleEn": "https://www.neuvottelija.com/ai/ep114-the-great-reset-2-0-tuomas-malinen/", "aiArticleFi": "https://www.neuvottelija.fi/yhteiskunta/ep114-the-great-reset-2-0-tuomas-malinen/"}